Department 47 -- UFOs, Paranormal Discussion Forum Index  
FAQ Search
Memberlist Usergroups
Profile Log in to check your private messages
Register Log in
its almost with fear and trepidation that I ask,
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Department 47 -- UFOs, Paranormal Discussion Forum Index -> The Philip J. Klass Memorial Debate Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Carol Nistri



Joined: 16 Jun 2007
Posts: 3350

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 12:33 pm    Post subject: its almost with fear and trepidation that I ask, Reply with quote

what would convince you Steve,as one skeptic said,"we've got a ton of soft evidence" I know its hard evidence thats lacking,so what would it take to have convinced Mr.Klass and Steve?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dr wu23



Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 2294
Location: Indiana

PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:44 pm    Post subject: Re: its almost with fear and trepidation that I ask, Reply with quote

Carol Nistri wrote:
what would convince you Steve,as one skeptic said,"we've got a ton of soft evidence" I know its hard evidence thats lacking,so what would it take to have convinced Mr.Klass and Steve?


I think he did say irrefutable proof..that about covers it.

btw, you should have left this under the debate thread since it is about evidence and Klass.
Smile
_________________
"Some say the valley has always been haunted ever since River ran.
The rippling waters fast as the colors conceal the Green Man."
Roy Harpur from The Green Man
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Skeptical
Site Admin


Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Posts: 1702
Location: Cincinnati, OH

PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would think that Klass would have required a piece of hard evidence, something he could hold in his hand (either literally or figuratively). That piece of evidence must, in and of itself, demonstrate "alien-ness'. It would require no support of human testimony. It could stand alone. I think a piece of technology would easily fill the bill. Biological evidence (from a body down to DNA) would also work.

The thing that Klass didn't like is that all the alleged hard evidence we have requires some human somewhere to associate it with a UFO sighting (e.g. this burnt bush is evidence because Bob saw it scorched by a UFO). If someone were to produce protoplasm of a silicon-based life form or some such thing - something that scientists could put under their microscopes, then collectively ask, "What the hell is that?" - that would make an impact. But, as long as human testimony is so tightly integrated with all the evidence we have, we will see no great movement in the interest of mainstream science in UFOs.

S

PS: Here's a link to an article on a guy who says he has hard evidence - but only because he claims it's evidence:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2001961735_ufo22.html
_________________
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." -- Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ataraxik



Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 635
Location: Manteo, Roanoke Island, NC

PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aluminum in a teardrop shape is a classic space junk profile. And once again I see that mainstream science, which refuses to look at UFOs, looked at his UFO. Unfortunately he's having a hard time accepting they found nothing extraterrestrial.
_________________
I am not young enough to know everything. - Oscar Wilde
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Somerville Changeling



Joined: 09 Sep 2007
Posts: 396
Location: Central Texas

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:08 pm    Post subject: Re: its almost with fear and trepidation that I ask, Reply with quote

dr wu23 wrote:
Carol Nistri wrote:
what would convince you Steve,as one skeptic said,"we've got a ton of soft evidence" I know its hard evidence thats lacking,so what would it take to have convinced Mr.Klass and Steve?


I think he did say irrefutable proof..that about covers it.

btw, you should have left this under the debate thread since it is about evidence and Klass.
Smile


I'd suggest Steve meant irrefutable ETH proof, as in a saucer landing on the White House lawn. I do not think that skeptics are constitutionally designed to accept irrefutable proof of the EDH. They would just consider it an hallucination.

Skep, I sent you a PM. I reregistered because I could not sign in under my old name yipsl. I decided to go folklore oriented user name anyways. Please switch my moderator privileges for the Folklore board over to Somerville Changeling.

Thanks,

Daniel
_________________
Two Western, two Middle Eastern and two Asian religions expect the end of an age soon. Whatever happens. Don't take the mark. Don't be deceived. Search for the truth and the truth will set you free.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Carol Nistri



Joined: 16 Jun 2007
Posts: 3350

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

naw Yip,I mean Somer,nothing so dramatic as a flying saucer landing on the white house lawn,the one and only thing that would do it for these guys is to have this government and this government alone to make a public declaration that flying saucers are real,does anyone know what fun that would be? It would.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steve



Joined: 31 Aug 2007
Posts: 93

PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:38 pm    Post subject: Re: its almost with fear and trepidation that I ask, Reply with quote

Somerville Changeling wrote:
dr wu23 wrote:
Carol Nistri wrote:
what would convince you Steve,as one skeptic said,"we've got a ton of soft evidence" I know its hard evidence thats lacking,so what would it take to have convinced Mr.Klass and Steve?


I think he did say irrefutable proof..that about covers it.

btw, you should have left this under the debate thread since it is about evidence and Klass.
Smile


I'd suggest Steve meant irrefutable ETH proof, as in a saucer landing on the White House lawn. I do not think that skeptics are constitutionally designed to accept irrefutable proof of the EDH. They would just consider it an hallucination...
"Irrefutable proof of the EDH" is an oxymoron. What the EDH actually represents is an attempt to make sense out of the inconsistencies surrounding fortean lore without losing faith in same. Some people need to believe.

Regarding the "constitution" of a "skeptic" you make two mistakes. First, you assign the label "skeptic" selectively when the trait is universal and, at least in this case, seem to imply that skepticism about the EDH requires some sort of "constitutional design" deficit.

The EDH can be a delusional slippery-slope and this is reflected by your posts which are basically long-winded pontifications with one lame theme - you're right and everyone else is wrong. To justify your own gullibility you misrepresent skepticism, what science really is, and demonstrate that you eschew critical thinking by selectively taking everything that you feel supports your beliefs at face value, even fairy tales.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Carol Nistri



Joined: 16 Jun 2007
Posts: 3350

PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 5:38 am    Post subject: well you know Steve Reply with quote

our dealings with skeptics have made them less like skeptics and more like men that refuse to be moved even one inch in any direction.Theres something to be said for scientific method but how many men of discovery had that attitude of science is always right.Science is a manmade thing,it could be wrong.Maybe wrong is the incorrect answer perhaps incomplete.Theres room for expansion.From what Ive gathered it seems that science restricts thinking,you cant think outside of these peramiters its forbidden,that alone should make some kick over there traces.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steve



Joined: 31 Aug 2007
Posts: 93

PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:54 am    Post subject: Re: well you know Steve Reply with quote

Carol Nistri wrote:
our dealings with skeptics have made them less like skeptics and more like men that refuse to be moved even one inch in any direction.
If one is skeptical about something why would they "move even one inch" without indisputable evidence? You believe in "flying saucers" without evidence of ET, that's faith. A skeptic needs more than that. Tell me, aren't you skeptical of the 'Project Mogul' explanation for Roswell? Doesn't that make you a "skeptic" as well? Wink
CarolNistri wrote:
Theres something to be said for scientific method but how many men of discovery had that attitude of science is always right.Science is a manmade thing,it could be wrong.Maybe wrong is the incorrect answer perhaps incomplete.Theres room for expansion.From what Ive gathered it seems that science restricts thinking,you cant think outside of these peramiters its forbidden,that alone should make some kick over there traces.
Heh, you obviously don't understand what science really is and couldn't be more wrong. Don't take my word for it, a google-type search of 'the scientific method' is all you need... here's a Wiki link to get you started.

You're probably not aware you do this but you frequently employ a double standard re:UFOs. Just now you decry science yet elsewhere you frequently clamor for the scientific community to get involved. In your prior post you state:
Quote:
naw Yip,I mean Somer,nothing so dramatic as a flying saucer landing on the white house lawn,the one and only thing that would do it for these guys is to have this government and this government alone to make a public declaration that flying saucers are real,does anyone know what fun that would be? It would.
yet elsewhere you state the government lies and covers things up. So if they tell you something you want to hear they're suddenly "honest Abe's?"

Interesting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Carol Nistri



Joined: 16 Jun 2007
Posts: 3350

PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 12:50 pm    Post subject: Steve Reply with quote

lets say this,the day comes when theres a very public announcement,take your pick,President Bush? Ok Pres.Bush calls a news conference in which he along with all the vips from his administration reveal to the public that flying saucers are real,he also says in that same conference that because of national security no details will be made public,the only thing you are told is that its all true,he touches on space craft,alien abdcutions lets see what else,well whatever weve been discussing for years he touches on it finishing up by saying that it was thought that the time was right for the public to be made aware of this phenomenon once and forall. Now,Steve,think about this first,if no other information is forthcoming to the public wouldnt you believe the announcement from the government that ufos are real? No scientific information whatsoever is going to be given to the public only the governments assurance that all of the stories all these years have basis in fact. What would be your reaction?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ataraxik



Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 635
Location: Manteo, Roanoke Island, NC

PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 3:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

First, let me tie a long, stout rope around Steve's ankle before he gets any deeper into intellectual debate with Ms. Carol.

Then, let me add that such a declaration and expectation of belief from a president, offered without accompanying evidence, constitutes the logical fallacy of an appeal to authority and is to be doubted until conclusive evidence is presented.

Nixon: "Well, I am not a crook!"
Daddy Bush: "Read my lips - no new taxes!"
Clinton: "I did not have sex with that woman!"

You doubt it because it comes from a politician, never mind the extraordinary nature of the claim.
_________________
I am not young enough to know everything. - Oscar Wilde
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Carol Nistri



Joined: 16 Jun 2007
Posts: 3350

PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:01 pm    Post subject: Atar said, Reply with quote

"Then, let me add that such a declaration and expectation of belief from a president, offered without accompanying evidence, constitutes the logical fallacy of an appeal to authority and is to be doubted until conclusive evidence is presented."

Ill bet you anything and initially that wouldnt be so.Maybe after the general public had time to think of it but not right off the bat.The first reaction would run the gamet but only the scientists and those that had been duped would demand that the evidence is presented to the public,then would start a whole new round of questions without answers,but for many this would be the holy grail,It also could be a disastor,the person that does the revealing holds all the cards,and the strings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dr wu23



Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 2294
Location: Indiana

PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Carol,
If the president announced that ufos are aliens from space the first thing the press/media would do is ask for evidence of how the govt. knows this is so. If there was none given many would remain skeptical about the declaration.
_________________
"Some say the valley has always been haunted ever since River ran.
The rippling waters fast as the colors conceal the Green Man."
Roy Harpur from The Green Man
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Carol Nistri



Joined: 16 Jun 2007
Posts: 3350

PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 5:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

my,Im surprised your saying that Dr.Wu,that means theres a hole in my story,hmm.Ok hows about this. The meeting is called from the Oval office,no reporters are there. (and the crowd roars...) Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ataraxik



Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 635
Location: Manteo, Roanoke Island, NC

PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd like to request a translator, please... (?)
_________________
I am not young enough to know everything. - Oscar Wilde
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Department 47 -- UFOs, Paranormal Discussion Forum Index -> The Philip J. Klass Memorial Debate Forum All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB
Hosted by FreeForums.org