| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Carol Nistri
Joined: 16 Jun 2007 Posts: 3292
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheScamDetective
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 1351 Location: California
|
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Carol
A belief in god seems to be on the way out. I agree with the part about the more educated one is, the more likely they will realize that what religion teaches is just a myth.
A good question to ask believers is...WHY do you believe what you do?? _________________ "It's our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities."
Dumbledore
to Harry Potter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Skeptical Site Admin

Joined: 13 Jun 2007 Posts: 1661 Location: Cincinnati, OH
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scam, I have to wonder whether most atheists have a problem with God or just a problem with religion. I will be the first to admit that there is no organized religion that comes close to my spiritual beliefs. I will also be the first to admit that organized religion, when taken in toto, has done at least as much harm as it has good.
But I think, if you divorce yourself from the many, mutually-exclusive dogmas religions present, you are left with a very Zen relationship between creature and creator -- at least that is the way it has worked for me.
S _________________ "A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." -- Thomas Jefferson
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheScamDetective
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 1351 Location: California
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Skep
I cannot speak for other Athiests, but I have a problem with "god" as it is commonly taught. The god of the bible is just too ludicrous for belief, imo.
I agree with you about organized religion. Seems to me passing the plate is more important than "saving souls".
The only concept that I can accept is that an alien race intervened in our evolution and we are the descendents of that action. I would NOT refer to them as god or gods!!!
As for who or what created the universe and life forms that predate us, that is still a mystery and I prefer to call it
Creation and let it go at that. _________________ "It's our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities."
Dumbledore
to Harry Potter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dr wu23

Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 2254 Location: Indiana
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Skep,
I think you hit the nail on the head. I have done a lot of reading on this issue lately as most here know. The atheists like Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens, have more of a problem with the harm ,bigotry, and nationalism that comes out of fundamental religious ideology than the abstract philosophical idea of God. _________________ "Some say the valley has always been haunted ever since River ran.
The rippling waters fast as the colors conceal the Green Man."
Roy Harpur from The Green Man
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dr wu23

Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 2254 Location: Indiana
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TheScamDetective wrote: |
Skep
I cannot speak for other Athiests, but I have a problem with "god" as it is commonly taught. The god of the bible is just too ludicrous for belief, imo.
I agree with you about organized religion. Seems to me passing the plate is more important than "saving souls".
The only concept that I can accept is that an alien race intervened in our evolution and we are the descendents of that action. I would NOT refer to them as god or gods!!!
As for who or what created the universe and life forms that predate us, that is still a mystery and I prefer to call it
Creation and let it go at that. |
What idea of 'God' are you comfortable with then..?
BTW, Creation is a loaded term and used by those who do believe in a Creator. I suggest you find another one.
 _________________ "Some say the valley has always been haunted ever since River ran.
The rippling waters fast as the colors conceal the Green Man."
Roy Harpur from The Green Man
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheScamDetective
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 1351 Location: California
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dr Wu
"What idea of 'God' are you comfortable with then..?
BTW, Creation is a loaded term and used by those who do believe in a Creator. I suggest you find another one."
~
I am not comfortable with ANY idea of "God".
Creation is a mystery and therefore cannot be labeled as an entity.
To quote from Gary Kinders book, Light Years... "Creation is a law unto itself and every form of life must conform to it and become part of it."
I wonder what I should call myself now...I am not an Atheist in the usual interpretation anymore.
Creationist implies belief in the god of the bible...so thats out.
Maybe an Alien/Creatheist???lol
Say THAT quickly 3 times!!!! _________________ "It's our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities."
Dumbledore
to Harry Potter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dr wu23

Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 2254 Location: Indiana
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TheScamDetective wrote: |
Dr Wu
"What idea of 'God' are you comfortable with then..?
BTW, Creation is a loaded term and used by those who do believe in a Creator. I suggest you find another one."
~
I am not comfortable with ANY idea of "God".
Creation is a mystery and therefore cannot be labeled as an entity.
To quote from Gary Kinders book, Light Years... "Creation is a law unto itself and every form of life must conform to it and become part of it."
I wonder what I should call myself now...I am not an Atheist in the usual interpretation anymore.
Creationist implies belief in the god of the bible...so thats out.
Maybe an Alien/Creatheist???lol
Say THAT quickly 3 times!!!! |
IMO you are still confusing some terms.
The word Creation implies a Creator by the term itself...period. Anyone who uses the term including Kinder is using it incorrectly if he's not postulating a Creator. He and others then should be using Universe or Reality . Those do not imply an intelligence behind things.
As far as you accepting the alien intervention hypothesis you are also doing that on 'faith' just like religious believers do since there is no objecive evidence to support or prove a current theory of that. Like belief in God the belief in aliens is speculative and based on faith . There is no real scientific evidence for either position. Some think because it's aliens it's a more rational belief and while it fits into scientific possibility there still is no current proof of it. _________________ "Some say the valley has always been haunted ever since River ran.
The rippling waters fast as the colors conceal the Green Man."
Roy Harpur from The Green Man
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheScamDetective
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 1351 Location: California
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dr Wu
I can agree and disagree with you up to a point.
To imply is not to strictly define...period!!
When you are dealing with a mystery, you cannot correctly label it as anything specific.
The universe and life were created...whether by an entity or a physical phenomena...no one really knows for a fact. Science has much more data to support the physical phenomena than "believers" do for the idea of god as a creator.
I currently subscribe to the theory of alien intervention because I can see the possibility of that being more plausible, and possible, than the other theories.
I have to chuckle, because you are the one who encouraged me to read Kinders book!!
Btw, thank you, it was very informative. _________________ "It's our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities."
Dumbledore
to Harry Potter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dr wu23

Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 2254 Location: Indiana
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TheScamDetective wrote: |
Dr Wu
I can agree and disagree with you up to a point.
To imply is not to strictly define...period!!
When you are dealing with a mystery, you cannot correctly label it as anything specific.
The universe and life were created...whether by an entity or a physical phenomena...no one really knows for a fact. Science has much more data to support the physical phenomena than "believers" do for the idea of god as a creator.
I currently subscribe to the theory of alien intervention because I can see the possibility of that being more plausible, and possible, than the other theories.
I have to chuckle, because you are the one who encouraged me to read Kinders book!!
Btw, thank you, it was very informative. |
Kinders book was about Meier not Creation ...btw.
If one does not use words correctly as they are defined then what they are saying is misinterpreted...period.
Using the word creation means a creator by definition and not some purely physical process . I'm a stickler on proper use of words because it causes many problems online with dialogue. _________________ "Some say the valley has always been haunted ever since River ran.
The rippling waters fast as the colors conceal the Green Man."
Roy Harpur from The Green Man
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheScamDetective
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 1351 Location: California
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dr Wu
I purposely didn't state WHO said what...just referred to a quote from Kinders book.
I'd reather discuss the what ..rather than the who.
~
Using the word creation means a creator by definition and not some purely physical process."
~
Ok, let's get technical then.
Creation has many meanings...according to my dictionary and thesaurus.
Some of its meanings are.. ...to bring into existence...formation...
invention..concoction.
Those definitions do not apply ONLY to a "god".
Many natural phenonmena bring new things into existence...earthquakes can create mountains.
Are all inventors gods?
So anyone who makes any kind of concoction...is a god?
According to you...the above answers would be yes!!
Even the word creator is NOT limited to "god"!!!
Ahhh but you say that when the c is capitalized it means god.....right? Well, only because (according to my trusty thesaurus..... "Latin-speaking Christians COINED both words ( Creator and Creation with a capital C) in translating the Old and New Testaments from Hebrew and Greek. Our use of
"creation" to mean "the world" comes from the King James version of Romans 8:22 "For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now."
The Latin root is creare..to produce.
It was the early Christian translators who gave it the capital C and thus...
"Using the word creation means a creator by definition and not some purely physical process."....that is not correct. You didn't use a capital C!!!! _________________ "It's our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities."
Dumbledore
to Harry Potter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dr wu23

Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 2254 Location: Indiana
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TheScamDetective wrote: |
Dr Wu
I purposely didn't state WHO said what...just referred to a quote from Kinders book.
I'd reather discuss the what ..rather than the who.
~
Using the word creation means a creator by definition and not some purely physical process."
~
Ok, let's get technical then.
Creation has many meanings...according to my dictionary and thesaurus.
Some of its meanings are.. ...to bring into existence...formation...
invention..concoction.
Those definitions do not apply ONLY to a "god".
Many natural phenonmena bring new things into existence...earthquakes can create mountains.
Are all inventors gods?
So anyone who makes any kind of concoction...is a god?
According to you...the above answers would be yes!!
Even the word creator is NOT limited to "god"!!!
Ahhh but you say that when the c is capitalized it means god.....right? Well, only because (according to my trusty thesaurus..... "Latin-speaking Christians COINED both words ( Creator and Creation with a capital C) in translating the Old and New Testaments from Hebrew and Greek. Our use of
"creation" to mean "the world" comes from the King James version of Romans 8:22 "For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now."
The Latin root is creare..to produce.
It was the early Christian translators who gave it the capital C and thus...
"Using the word creation means a creator by definition and not some purely physical process."....that is not correct. You didn't use a capital C!!!! |
You hate it when you are wrong ...don't you?
The simple fact is that in common usage and understanding when one uses the word creation in talking about origins of the universe or mankind or any end product ,caps or not, it implies a creator., human or god.
So secondary and tertiary definitions are irrelevant.
I suggest you use another word or people might start thinking you are a closet theist.
 _________________ "Some say the valley has always been haunted ever since River ran.
The rippling waters fast as the colors conceal the Green Man."
Roy Harpur from The Green Man
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheScamDetective
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 1351 Location: California
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dr Wu
lol I still enjoy debating with you, you're one of my favs!!
~
"You hate it when you are wrong ...don't you?"
~
Then Webster and my Thesaurus must be wrong too
~
"So secondary and tertiary definitions are irrelevant."
~
All definitions are relevant or we wouldn't need more than one!!
~
"I suggest you use another word or people might start thinking you are a closet theist."
~
A creator does not necessarily mean a "god".
Ok...how about I call myself an Alienist...oops make that alienist with a small A...aliens are not god(s)!!!  _________________ "It's our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities."
Dumbledore
to Harry Potter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dr wu23

Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 2254 Location: Indiana
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TheScamDetective wrote: |
Dr Wu
.....~
A creator does not necessarily mean a "god".
Ok...how about I call myself an Alienist...oops make that alienist with a small A...aliens are not god(s)!!!  |
Yes it does mean some kind of 'god' or intelligence if you are using it regarding origin of the universe or reality in relation to religion.
What else could create? The only other option would be a super race of aliens who created the universe. In eiher case it implies a creation by a creator, small or large caps. I'd love to hear another ontological interpretation.
Go for it.
 _________________ "Some say the valley has always been haunted ever since River ran.
The rippling waters fast as the colors conceal the Green Man."
Roy Harpur from The Green Man
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheScamDetective
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 1351 Location: California
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dr Wu
"Yes it does mean some kind of 'god' or intelligence if you are using it regarding origin of the universe or reality in relation to religion."
~
Origin of the universe is not limited to a belief that "god" created it.
There are other explanations, as well...big bang, for instance.
~
"What else could create?"
~
Well, using a small c...a dress designer creates fashionable clothing...a hair dresser creates a hair-do, etc.
With a capital C, then you are denoting some kind of
honor to the creator...as in a god...or an elevated
entity or intelligence.
When I use a capital C...for Creation...I do not mean an entity...but it gives it honor....for I think that Creation is still a mystery....not a god.
Just like when we capitalize Mr. or Mrs. or
Sir Walter Raleigh...it is an honorary way to spell it.
Same with the White House, it is usually capitalized too even though it is not an entity.
Same for holidays, etc.
Get it now?? _________________ "It's our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities."
Dumbledore
to Harry Potter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|