New DNA Testing clears Ramseys,(snort,right)

**Carol Nistri** · Joined: 16 Jun 2007 Posts: 3216

http://www.welcomescreen.aol.com/redir.adp?_e_t=ap&_a_v=2.0&_a_i=200100397x1205191853x1200262943&_url=http%3a%2f%2fnews%2eaol%2ecom%2fstory%2f%5fa%2fdna%2dclears%2dramsey%2dfamily%2dof%2dmurder%2f20080709151409990001%3ficid%3d200100397x1205191853x1200262943

Phooey,Im not buying this for a minute,someone ought to check that DA's offshore bank account.

**Revan** · Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 128 Location: USA

They would need to phyically show me the proof and explain it to me, because I am not buying it.
_________________
http://www.ufoalley.net

**dr wu23** · Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 2150 Location: Indiana

I saw this on the news last night. DNA evidence doesn't lie but all it is really saying is that someone other than the family is involved and might be the killer. It doesn't totally clear anyone at this stage imo.
At any rate it's a moot point since Mrs Ramsey is now dead and she was the one most suspected.
_________________
"Some say the valley has always been haunted ever since River ran.
The rippling waters fast as the colors conceal the Green Man."
Roy Harpur from The Green Man

**TheScamDetective** · Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 1325 Location: California

I saw that on the news too.
I have never really believed her parents could have done that to her.
The way she was killed just doesn't seem like something her parents would have done.
But...anything is possible nowdays.
I just hate to think they could have done it. What could a little girl have possibly done to make a parent so angry they would kill her in such a brutal and cold-hearted way??
_________________
"It's our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities."
Dumbledore
to Harry Potter

**Carol Nistri** · Joined: 16 Jun 2007 Posts: 3216

its pure speculation at this point but Patsy could have snapped and killed her own child,history is ripe with stories of parents killing their own children,you read it every month in the newspapers. The fact that the husband has done and said nothing as far as indicating that Patsy was the one that actually killed the little girl could be viewed two ways. What should be glaring is how the little girl was killed. A man that wanted to strangle her needed only his bare hands to snuff the light of such a small young child. A women however one that had ovarian cancer and just finished treatment would use a garret,the garret was a paint brush from Patsy Ramseys own collection. Patsy said she went into Jon's room and saw that she was missing,she then said she found the note on the stairs picked it up and gave it to John Ramseys to read,yet there were NO fingerprints of any kind found on the note,a good attorney could have gotten a conviction from this case,circumstantial tho it may be Ill bet had they both thought this was going all the way one of them would have cracked and it would have been John Ramsey.

**dr wu23** · Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 2150 Location: Indiana

The psychological profile on this fits a sexual deviant....not either parent imo.
I suspect it was someone close to the family that was around that nght and they probably knew who it was but no evidence was able to point in that unknown persons direction..until now.
_________________
"Some say the valley has always been haunted ever since River ran.
The rippling waters fast as the colors conceal the Green Man."
Roy Harpur from The Green Man

**Skeptical** · Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:57 pm Post subject:

I always suspected it was the brother and Mom & Dad covered it up so that they wouldn't lose both children. But that's pure conjecture and probably not fair to anyone involved. Confused

S
_________________
“...If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers." -- Thomas Pynchon

**Carol Nistri** · Joined: 16 Jun 2007 Posts: 3216

that would be Burke I think,he knows the truth and one day he might write a best seller.